Some people believe, or claim to believe, that this car is parked legally. It's in the house's driveway, right? Wrong! San Francisco houses typically have zero setback, meaning that the property line ends with the street facing wall. The space the owner of this car would describe as "my driveway" is in fact not "his" or "hers". It's public right of way, and thus the car is parked illegally. The only time this car should be on the sidewalk is during entering / exiting the garage.
12 comments:
and if it's there driveway, I expect that if I go jackhammer the hell out of it, they won't expect the city to fix it!
In my experience DPW does not always ticket these. A big step to getting somewhere with this problem is the lack of consciousness by drivers. The City has never had an information campaign stating the laws and why they exist.
But if you were a homeowner in SF, you would know that when it comes time to maintain the driveway in front of your home, the homeowner is solely responsible for the cost. I had to pay $1,000s to have my driveway repaved. The cost to the city, $0. But yet when I have people over and they park in the manner in which you show in this picture (still space to get around the car), they get a parking ticket. I think if you would focus more on actually becoming a productive member of society (and paying property taxes), you would form the opposite opinion. Finny how that works. Good luck!
I think there needs to be a sensible middle ground. Nealry everyone has an occasion where they need to park in "their" driveway.
It is the abuse of driveway parking to be concerned about, not occasional use.
One time I parked in our driveway to help my wife get in the car when she went into labor. The car was there about 15 minutes while I went into the house and helped her out.
Lots of times we have school carpoolers park for 5-10 minutes in our driveway during kid pickups and dropoffs. Real actual people and families live in these houses.
I usually try and park parallel in front of "my" driveway, but in the rare cases where I do park in the driveway, if someone called on me and I got a $100 ticket - some bad karma would lay heavy on the caller.
If what you say is true, then this site is not targeted at you. I have no issue with someone picking up kids etc. in the driveway for a couple of minutes every once in a while. All this is very different from treating the public sidewalk in front of your house as your own personal parking lot. Very bad "karma" indeed!
I have to agree with both sides on this. I just received a ticket for this type of parking, not knowing that this was a problem, expecially since a pedestrian or wheelchair person could get around the vehicle and on the sidewalk, but I suppose with a city and state economy close to collapse, it is time to adjust, to their collection efforts.
We have received a ticket like this just a couple of hours ago while I went upstairs to pick up my daughter from my PIL. My husband stayed in the car and I have calle him because of a couple of havy bags that I needed help with... It took the guy 2 minutes to issue a ticket. We saw him puting it behind the wipers when we exited the house.
I have tried to ask him 'why' and he turned around and literally ran away... obviously feeling embarrassed... In addition to it, the address showed the house number next to the one where we parked the car.
There was more than 10 feet between the car and the curb and even 2 wheelchairs would pass side by side easily...
The ticket is $103.00 and does not feel right...
California Vehicle Code Section 22500:
"On any portion of a sidewalk"
Define sidewalk. Because "zero setback" or not, driveway is not sidewalk.
Ok, the Zero Setback is a myth. Read the zoning part of San Francisco Municipal code. For most residential properties, it says "Based upon average of adjacent buildings; up to 15 ft. or 15% of lot depth". In this photo, it's about 15 feet.
I don't mind this car at all. It's not even close to blocking the entire sidewalk, people and wheelchairs can get by easily. The white one in the background is more of an actual problem.
I agree that where the PT Cruiser is parked should not be a problem. If it is against the law, that is bad law. There is plenty of space for people to get around this car. If the city wants to lay down and enforce draconian laws that prevent a homeowner from using the "driveway" for parking, then they should pay for all maintenance of that space.
@murphstahoe - It'd be the property owners responsibility to repair the sidewalk in front of his/her property, so no, the City won't pay anything to fix it. They'll fine you and force you to pay for permits to fix it yourself.
Post a Comment